20 December 2020 – Sunday – #126

Happy Winter! ¡Feliz Invierno!

Pork for sale in Gracia.

As the northern hemisphere transitions from Fall to Winter, transitional stress is upon us. Stress is normal during the holidays, but this year I’m feeling stress that’s different from normal.

The stress of not whether, but when new restrictions will be announced as Covid-19 numbers rise again. The stress of risky gatherings during a normally social holiday season. The stress of living with a deadly virus not knowing how many months until vaccinations. The stress of an unending political transitions.

What did I do in the midst of all my stress? I had the most social week I’ve had since March.

It started when Brad and I had an impromptu latke night to celebrate Hanukkah.

2020 latkes!

We improvised with Greek yogurt for sour cream and apple compote for apple sauce. Delish.

Two other dinners at Casa Solar this week. My friends Ana and Alexa are returning to their homelands, Ana to Mexico after nearly a dozen years here and Alexa to Germany after five years. Happy for their new adventures, but sad to see friends leave. How could I not celebrate and share a dinner with each of them? It reminds me of myself a year ago, staying at Ebet’s place on the Upper West Side and celebrating with friends as I prepared to move to Barcelona.

Wednesday I took a trip up to Canet de Mar to see friends. It’s been months and it was great to catch up, but there’s the stress of the hour train ride as Catalonia’s Covid-19 numbers rise again. Most of the high school boys who boarded near the end of my journey wore masks, but not the class cutups. Stress.

Here is a graph of my stress. The Covid-19 reproduction rate R and Outbreak risk here look as bad as they looked in October when Europe’s second Covid-19 wave started in earnest.

Catalonia Covid-19 reproduction rate R (yellow) and Outbreak risk (blue), 18 December 2020.

At the beginning of this month, Catalonia allowed bars and restaurants to reopen and relaxed retail capacity restrictions. People want normal life, especially during the holidays. The numbers rose again. It looks like new restrictions will be coming soon.

This week’s final social event was yesterday when I met Cristián for coffee at SandwiChez. We sat outside, which felt relatively safe, if a bit brisk. Even though the tables inside were well spaced, it felt like a Covid-torium with a large room of maskless people and no fresh air ventilation. I spent as little time as possible inside ordering.

After my final social event of the week, I walked along Rambla de Catalunya looking for Christmas decorations.

Holiday shoppers on Gran VIa and Passeig de Gracia in Barcelona, 19 December 2020.

Masked shoppers were out in force. I felt a little uneasy waiting in line for the cashier with my hands full of ornaments, but at least there was a breeze as shoppers entered and exited the store.

Everyone seems to be sneaking in as much shopping and social life as they can before the next restrictions come. It’s like everyone knows a vaccine is coming and they’re playing a game to see how much they can get away with while waiting for shots. The stress of restrictions is bumping heads with the relief of a vaccine, so people are questioning more and more what restrictions are fair and necessary.

For instance, here’s a report from Madrid about the Rafael concert last night.

Matthew Bennett on the Raphael concert last night.

During 2020, while most US states let Covid-19 run wild, most European countries put in place restrictions as outbreaks occurred. The difference couldn’t be clearer (this chart is through the first week of December).

Covid-19 cases per million, US versus EU as of 11 December 2020. (Source: @euromaestro)

There’s no question most US states won’t impose any serious Covid-19 restrictions this winter. The question is whether any European countries can impose restrictions again with Covid-19 vaccines around the corner.

Beyond unnecessary deaths, there are significant costs to allowing Covid-19 spread. One is that high infection rates slow down economies. When people are sick and dying, they can’t work. Another is that the virus has more opportunities to mutate.

And guess what? This week UK detected a new strain of Covid-19 that’s 70% more transmissible.

In response, Prime Minister Boris Johnson raised Covid-19 restrictions and, in an attempt to contain the new strain to the UK, will keep anyone from traveling out of areas where the new strain is detected. Likewise, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon raised Covid-19 restrictions in response and asked Scots to remain at home for Christmas.

Officials say there is nothing about the new strain that indicates so far that it has different mortality characteristics or a different response to vaccines. My guess is that it’s too early to know that for sure. I don’t have to guess about more strains appearing as the number of cases skyrockets worldwide.

Will government requests to stay home work? Last week, I posted German Chancellor Merkel’s heartfelt appeal to stay home during the holidays. Spain has issued stay home requests. So has the US CDC.

US air travel numbers indicate that at least US travel isn’t creeping up to last year’s levels.

US Air Travelers per Day, 1 November through 18 December. Source: TSA

It would be better to see 2020 numbers declining rather than tracking at about half of last year’s numbers. If Thanksgiving is any indication, these travel statistics indicate many US families will be sharing their final Christmas together.

Vaccines are coming, but it’s months until their effect reduces the need for Covid-19 restrictions. The UK, Canada, and the US have started administering Covid-19 vaccinations. Spain expects to distribute Covid-19 vaccine as soon as the EMA approves use of the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine, probably the last week of December or first week of January 2021.

The US vaccine rollout shows the main reason we shouldn’t let down our guard: the logistics of providing hundreds of millions of injects are hard. I was worried that the lack of communication from Trump about his Covid-19 vaccination plan meant there wasn’t a solid plan. More and more, that seems to be the case.

Rachael Maddow on US Covid-19 vaccine debacle.

On Friday, General Gustave Perna said that a Pentagon computer model used to plan distribution was the source of the distribution problem. One report said that the model was still using simulation data until last week when actual data was loaded. Although it appears doses of Pfizer’s vaccine still are sitting in warehouses awaiting instructions from Trump where to send them, Perna says 20 million doses will be delivered to states by the first week of January.

Paint me skeptical.

For one thing, Trump is still focused on winning the election. On Monday, the Electoral College gave President-elect Biden 306 votes to Trump’s 232, and Republican senators finally acknowledged Biden’s win. However, Friday evening, Trump was planning a coup with his voter fraud legal strike team lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell as well as with disgraced General Michael Flynn. Flynn wants Trump to declare martial law in states that voted against Trump and have the military re-run those elections. It’s an understatement that Trump is ignoring Covid-19 vaccine delivery problems. The US will be lucky if Trump’s coup plan goes as well as his Covid-19 vaccination plan.

Besides distribution, another problem with the US vaccination effort is local administration. One example comes from Stanford University. There the hospital prioritized vaccinations for doctors who primarily work from home right now while failing to offer vaccines to residents working with patients daily. After protests, the university apologized and adjusted its vaccine allocations. This seems like the kind of problem that a well run vaccination effort would have anticipated.

The beginning of the vaccination process should be the easiest because the low-hanging fruit (healthcare workers and retirement homes) are easy to target. Trump can’t even seem to get that job done. President-elect Biden takes office in 31 days. The inauguration probably will mark the actual beginning of the US Covid-19 vaccine distribution program. It would be difficult for other countries’ governments do a worse job than the US, but it’s likely most programs at this scale will have hiccups.

Vaccines are many months away. We will be better off complying with ongoing Covid-19 restrictions.

Now for a quick trip in the time machine! Nine months ago, here’s what Goldman Sachs wrote to its clients about the emergence of Covid-19.

Goldman Sachs memo to clients, March 2020My commentary
50% of Americans will contract the virus (150m people) as it’s very communicable. This is on par with the common cold (Rhinovirus) of which there are about 200 strains and which the majority of Americans will get 2-4 per year.Overestimates spread. Covid-19 very different from Rhinovirus.
70% of Germany with contract it (58m people). This is the next most relevant economy to be effected.Spain is now around 10%, so Germany probably less.
Peak-virus is expected over the next eight weeks, declining thereafter.Implies reach of 50% of US and 70% of Germany in 10-12 weeks.
The virus appears to be concentrated in a band between 30-50 degrees north latitude, meaning that like the common cold and flu, it prefers cold weather. The coming summer in the northern hemisphere should help. That is to say the virus is likely seasonal.Ecuador is a counterexample to both latitude and cold weather.
Of those impacted, 80% will be early-stage, 15% mid-stage, and 5% critical-stage. Early-stage symptoms are like the common cold and mid-stage symptoms are like the flu; these are stay at home two weeks and rest. 5% will be critical and highly weighted towards the elderly.Early characterization of Covid-19 as old person’s disease.
Mortality rate on average up to 2% heavily weighted towards the elderly and immunocompromised; meaning up to 3m people (150m * .02). In the US about 3m/yr die mostly due to old age and disease, those two being highly correlated (as a percent very few from accidents). There will be significant overlap, so this does not mean 3m new deaths from the virus, it means elderly people dying sooner due to respiratory issues. This may however stress the healthcare system.The US probably will reach about a million Covid-19 deaths over a much longer period.
Goldman Sachs memo to clients, March 2020.

What’s striking in this early Goldman Sachs language is how it writes off old people. This appears to lay the foundation for the idea that it’s okay to achieve herd immunity by letting Covid-19 run wild. It suggests old people will just lose a few years and the whole thing will be over in a matter of two or three months.

Contemporaneously, Richard Epstein from the Hoover Institute published a paper called “Coronavirus Perspective.” Among other things, Epstein argued that adaptations would thwart the virus and the virus’ effect would be small as a result. Epstein is a lawyer, not an epidemiologist. Still, his paper found favor with Trump, probably because it discounted Covid-19’s virulence.

Based on his non-scientific analysis, Epstein explained in a New Yorker interview from late March 2020 how Covid-19 would evolve.

“So, in the United States, if you start looking at yesterday’s figures, it was about two per cent higher than the day before, which is already indicating that the speed-up is slowing down. We’re going to have to see what the next days do. But we’re talking ten thousand cases a day at the current maximum, and the flu was vastly larger in terms of its number and its extent. And my sense is, given the reactions that you’re going to have, this thing will peak earlier and start to decline earlier than the common models start to say, because they don’t seem to build in anything by way of adaptative responses.”

None of Epstein’s Covid-19 predictions were correct, but they also laid the foundation for doing nothing but let the virus run wild.

A month later, the Stanford epidemiologist John Ioannidis argued that lockdowns were the wrong approach, that it would be better to protect the elderly and let everyone else carry on. Ioannidis also authored the controversial Stanford study that claimed Covid-19 spread was much higher than thought and, by inference, Covid-19 IFR was much lower than thought. Ioannidis’ study was flawed, but it lent credibility to Trump’s claims that Covid-19 was going to go away.

A better US response would have been to increase testing so that policy could be designed based on better reporting. In retrospect, these three influential reports provided fodder for policies that resulted in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths.

Covid-19 bits.

Last, I’d like to leave you with the Tracies who are tracing you.


Merry Christmas! I write this for my sanity, not for money. If you like it, send a link to your friends and family as a holiday gift! Follow me on Twitter for more frequent updates.

13 December 2020 – Sunday – #125

It’s looking a lot like Christmas in Barcelona.

Christmas lights in Gracia

The benefits of Catalonia’s November lockdown are accruing to a nearly normal Christmas, except almost no tourists and, please, no extended family gatherings. Overall, Spain is looking pretty good, too.

After allowing restaurants and bars to reopen and reducing retail restrictions, the Catalan government has postponed further relaxation of Covid-19 restrictions. Here’s what restaurants in the Born district looked like yesterday on my bike ride. Note: many diners, few tourists.

Restaurants operating in Barcelona’s Born District, 12 December 2020.

While the number of new Covid-19 cases has dropped since Catalonia put in place its most recent restrictions, the reproduction rate R increased to just below 1.0 in the past week as it relaxed those restrictions. Some complain that the restrictions are arbitrary here and in the US, but the data indicate that the Catalan public health authority has landed on an effective set of restrictions to contain the virus two times in a row.

Catalan Covid-19 reproduction rate R (yellow) and Outbreak Risk (blue) as of 11 December 2020. (Source: Catalan News).

How bad is Covid-19 in the US? It’s experiencing a Thanksgiving surge in new cases on top of its fall surge. On Friday, the number of new US cases surpassed 280,000. Without any public health policy adjustments, the Covid-19 death toll likely will surpass 500,000 by President-elect Biden’s inauguration.

Good leadership communicates current conditions during a crisis. In the case of Covid-19, good leadership would communicate the risks of holiday gatherings. As the numbers above show, it’s too late for Thanksgiving holiday advisories in the US, but Hanukkah has started, Christmas is around the corner, and New Year’s is less than three weeks.

I want to note a couple things about comparative leadership, specifically US versus Germany.

First, let’s look at current Covid-19 public health messaging in the US. The CDC has communicated some holiday travel guidance, but President-elect Biden’s transition team has said more. What the US should expect as deaths surpass 3,000 per day is clear guidance from the top.

Trump, however, has been largely AWOL on Covid-19 and pretty much everything else since the November election, except except except, of course, rallying his supporters in Georgia. He wants to raise as much money as he can before he leaves the White House. Trump has raised over US$200 million since the election, some of which pays for his legal efforts to overturn the election results, most of which effectively goes into his pockets.

In other words, instead of helping the US at the very worst point in its Covid-19 crisis, Trump is focused instead on what is essentially a coup to steal the presidency. His supporters are rewarding him handsomely to keep trying. After losing his Supreme Court case Friday, Trump skipped a maskless White House Christmas party, presumably to figure out other ways to win the election he lost by one of the largest margins in modern times.

As a contrast to Trump’s inaction on Covid-19, here is a great example of leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic. Regardless of whether you agree with German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s policies, her plea to Germans to avoid family gatherings at Christmas is pitch perfect.

Angela Merkel asks Germans to stay home for Christmas to contain Covid-19. (English subtitles).

Merkel acknowledges the sacrifice she’s requesting is difficult, paints a clear picture of how bad the Covid-19 situation is in Germany, advises Germans what they need to do, and sells them on the benefits. This is the kind of fleisch und kartoffeln leadership that saves lives.

Another aspect of leadership is anticipating what’s next. The Covid-19 vaccines have arrived. Now what?

US leadership seems to be MIA on the vaccine roll out. Maybe there are plans, but I haven’t read any. In fact, last week I got this message from my former healthcare provider in New York.

Covid-19 message from New York healthcare provider.

The subtext of this text is that this healthcare provider, the provider that would have administered the Covid-19 vaccine to me if I’d stayed in New York, doesn’t have enough information about the vaccine to communicate its vaccination plan. I don’t think it’s the provider’s incompetence. Have you read anywhere how the US is going to inoculate 330,000,000 people in 2021?

Let’s do some math for US vaccinations. I’m using round numbers to make it easy.

People to vaccinate targeting about 90% of population300,000,000
Doses needed600,000,000
Minutes per vaccination10
Full Time Equivalent Staff Required (at 2,000 hours per year)50,000
Labor cost (assume average $100,000 loaded per FTE)$5 billion
Labor and cost estimates for delivering Covid-19 vaccine to 300 million Americans.

The US healthcare system delivers roughly 160 million doses of flu vaccine annually, so the Covid-19 vaccine effort is about four times its current capacity. That’s a little tricky because flu shot capacity is seasonal. However, unlike the first mRNA vaccines coming to market that require super cold distribution, flu vaccine distribution is simple to manage and flu vaccine requires only one shot.

There are roughly 200,000 practicing family doctors and pediatricians and another 125,000 physicians assistants in the US. If they provide the vaccinations, about 15% of US primary healthcare would be consumed in 2021 by Covid-19 vaccinations to the detriment of other maladies. Maybe nurses and pharmacists give vaccinations, too, but the impact of this many injections is significant.

If someone has a plan, they should say so. Where do Americans go for a vaccination and who tracks that they get a second shot in a month? Are local public health systems funded to vaccinate the uninsured? Are the millions of undocumented immigrants included in the plan?

By comparison, while the US may not have and certainly hasn’t communicated a Covid-19 rollout strategy, Germany is a week or so away from setting up vaccination centers.

Berlin’s six vaccination centers are designed to inoculate 20,000 people a day. At that capacity, all of Berlin will be vaccinated by July 2021.

End of leadership discussion. Assuming you want to eradicate Covid-19 in your community, ask you leaders to be more like Germany and less like the US.

Parenthetically, if you’ve been following along, you read last week about my flu vaccine trials and tribulations. I was happy to report to Mom this week that I got my flu shot. As I was writing this entry, I realized that CatSalut probably controlled flu vaccine administration this year to streamline vaccinations in the same way Berlin is streamlining Covid-19 shots. Given the stress Covid-19 is putting on healthcare systems, CatSalut needed to streamline vaccinations.

Vaccines will play a particularly vital role in countries like the US that can’t get their Covid-19 acts together. In case you’re wondering how well the new Covid-19 vaccines work, here are data from the BioNTech / Pfizer trials.

In a perfect world, US and EU herd immunity is six months away. Here in the real world, that means something like 9-12 months for developed countries to achieve herd immunity.

However, no one is really safe until the entire planet is inoculated. Here’s where things stand with worldwide Covid-19 vaccine development and distribution plans.

Eric Feigl-Ding thread on Covid-19 vaccines, 8 December 2020.

A reminder. Countries don’t need the vaccine to stop Covid-19. In about a month, they can do what Australia did. Here’s an Australian explaining how Covid-19 eradication worked.

Australian describes how Covid-19 lockdown worked.

The other topic I want to cover today is the trade-off between the economy and Covid-19 restrictions. There is a lot of good evidence coming out that the best way to prioritize the economy is to contain Covid-19 first.

When people argue that it’s more important to keep the economy open than to prevent Covid-19, the go-to example is Sweden. However, even Sweden doesn’t want to be Sweden any more.

Another piece of evidence comes from the Anderson Business School. It predicts the US economy will pick up after the Covid-19 vaccines provide herd immunity. In other words, if the US could lockdown for a month now to contain Covid-19, it probably would see its economy come back in 1Q2021 rather than 4Q2021 (or 3Q2021, depending on when you think herd immunity occurs). A month of lock down now would buy six to nine months of economic growth.

The most interesting evidence to me comes from CO2 emissions. While CO2 emissions have dropped in the US and EU by 10% – 15% this year, China’s CO2 emissions have increased so much that the global decrease in CO2 emissions will come out at about 7%. This map may help explain. It shows Covid-19 cases by country.

Covid-19 cases by country, 13 December 2020. (Source: nCov2019.live)

Because China has contained Covid-19 (86,725 confirmed cases versus 16,549,366 in the US), its economy is operating full steam ahead. Because its economy is operating, China is emitting lots of CO2.

I’m not sure anyone wants to tell its leaders to be more like China, but please stop arguing that the economy is more important than containing Covid-19. Evidence is piling up that containing Covid-19 is the quickest path to economic well being.

Instead of Covid-19 misinformation stories this week, I want to mention two cases of Covid-19 information suppression. One comes from Florida where state police raided Rebekah Jones house, confiscating computers and phones. Jones, a data scientist, was fired by the state last summer after she claimed Governor DeSantis was suppressing unflattering Covid-19 reports. The state says Jones broke into state computers last month, but the confiscation of her equipment is widely viewed as a retaliatory effort to stop other whistle blowers.

The other case involves an Arizona ER doctor who was terminated because of his tweets about hospital conditions. Dr. Cleavon Gilman received a supportive call from President-elect Biden during all this:

The message? Many in the US are more concerned with controlling Covid-19 messaging than with controlling the virus itself. History will judge reputations.

Covid-19 bits.

Last week I noted that erectile dysfunction may be a Covid-19 symptom since the virus affects the testes, vascular system, and other parts of the male anatomy associated with fertility.

This week’s Covid-19 malady is tooth loss. Reports are anecdotal so far, but unexpected tooth loss seems to be occurring frequently in people who have had Covid-19. Covid-19 appears to impair oral vasculature in some patients, especially if they have preexisting gum problems.

Congressman Louie Gohmert’s tooth fell out spontaneously during a press conference. If you watch carefully when he says the word “2001” at about the 8:16 mark, you’ll notice the tooth fall out. He rolls the detached tooth around his mouth before he completes the word.

US Representative Louie Gohmert’s tooth falls out as he says “2001” at about 8:16.

Gohmert had Covid-19 earlier in the year. His sudden and bloodless tooth loss is exactly how Covid-19 tooth loss has been described.

Last week I suggested scented candles as a Covid-19 pandemic holiday gift that doubles as a Covid-19 test. My friend Adam suggested another appropriate pandemic gift, toilet paper. Due to shortages, toilet paper has become the unofficial pandemic currency. In fact, Adam coined a name for the new Covid-19 currency and it’s perfect for everything that’s gone wrong in 2020. The new toilet paper currency is called Shitcoin.


I don’t write this for money, I write it for my sanity. If you like it, please mention it to friends and family. For more frequent Covid-19 updates, follow me on Twitter.

6 December 2020 – Sunday – #124

I know you’ve been worried about me getting a flu shot. Well, maybe not, but my mother has been and that’s worse. If you haven’t been following along, my private healthcare system said last month that I only could get the flu vaccine from CatSalut, Catalonia’s public health system. But CatSalut wouldn’t let me access public health without paying into its system. Without access, no flu shot. I could have forgone the shot. Since getting a flu shot may be a preview of getting a Covid-19 vaccine, though, it seemed important to figure out how.

I know what you’re thinking. Just pay CatSalut and get the flu shot. I tried. It’s treacherous, practically Kafkaesque. To join CatSalut, I needed dispensation from the INSS, the Spanish Social Security system. Even though I haven’t contributed to Spanish Social Security, Royal Decree 576/2013 allows me to join CatSalut with a Convenio Especial for 60 euros a month. I won’t go in the details, but I’d almost given up finding the right form when Brad and I broke the code.

After a Spanish lawyer couldn’t figure out the right INSS form, I called another medical private practice I use. Maybe they had the flu vaccine. But no, the receptionist said, they also couldn’t get vaccine from CatSalut. Then she suggested buying the vaccine at a pharmacy. A pharmacy? That was news. Brad went online and saw that recently the flu vaccine indeed became available in Catalonia through pharmacies. Magically, the broken vaccine system fixed itself.

I found a flu vaccine. Not right away. The improved system isn’t flawless. The third pharmacy I asked had it. Brad got his flu shot Friday. I’ll get mine next week.

I tell my flu shot story because it’s an example of allocation problems during a pandemic. ICYMI, Covid-19 has created some difficult one-time allocation problems. That is this week’s Covid Diary BCN theme.

Before I get to allocation and scarcity, though, I want to mention (again) that Covid-19 restrictions work. As Covid-19 numbers improve, Catalonia is relaxing more Covid-19 restrictions in front of the holidays. While I’m reading the horrendous Covid-19 news from the US, I’m shopping, exercising, planning a Covid-19 restriction compliant Christmas eve dinner, and traveling up the coast. All without enormous concerns about either getting Covid-19 or accessing good medical care if I do.

The US healthcare system is collapsing in states where (mostly Republican) governors fail to implement Covid-19 restrictions. Hospital and ICU beds are so short that families are appealing for help on social media.

When people resort to social media for hospital beds, it’s a sign free market allocation isn’t working.

The irony, of course–and there seems to be an epidemic of Covid-19 irony–is that leaders advocating against Covid-19 restrictions they claim keep their economies from opening up have created scarcity that keeps many parts of the free markets from functioning. There is scarcity throughout US healthcare, from staff to physical plant to medical supplies, scarcity that can resolve itself in 3-4 weeks with Covid-19 restrictions but can’t be fixed for months without them. Needless to say, healthcare scarcity hurts people who need healthcare for maladies other than Covid-19. Like, say, a heart attack.

Vaccines are creating an entirely different set of allocation issues. It seems like having the first two Covid-19 vaccines coming through the gates at 90% – 95% effective would be great news. It would excellent news if the two companies making them could produce in 2021 the roughly 15 billion doses needed for humankind to achieve herd immunity (both vaccines require two doses).

However, because the first two vaccines are so highly effective, it increases exorbitantly the trial costs of other vaccine candidates which now need to demonstrate similar or better effectiveness. There may be ways to reduce the cost of vaccine trials with new methods, but it looks like most of the 50+ vaccine candidates in human trials won’t be able to afford to move forward even though a few of them may be cheaper, easier to distribute, or provide longer-term protection. A portfolio of Covid-19 vaccines also reduces risk of one-off problems like supply chain anomalies for a specific vaccine.

Allocation of scarce vaccine trial resources is one vaccine problem. Another vaccine problem is ramp up. With two Covid-19 vaccines completing Phase 3 trials and entering various approval cycles, vaccine talk is turning to who gets vaccine first, another scarce resource allocation problem. In the US, if everything goes right, UCSF’s Dr. Bob Wachter expects herd immunity around September 2021.

That’s if everything goes right. This month, every country, state, and region is determining who will get the first Covid-19 vaccine shots. Will the first shots go to healthcare workers and nursing homes, or to essential workers in places like grocery stores where spread risk is high, or to bankers? Wait, bankers? Well, yeah, if you advocate that the economy is more important than people’s lives, if you advocate for opening the economy over Covid-19 restrictions, then wouldn’t you want to protect your banker first? More irony.

I’m waiting for Sarah Palin to trot out her “death panel” resource allocation scare tactics. Regardless of how fair you think socialized medicine is, your public health system is prioritizing life and death this month. The more people wear masks and keep their distance, the less life-and-death these scarce vaccine allocation decisions become. That seems like a pretty easy trade-off to me.

In every country, vaccination is a complex problem. Spain has decided the first 2.5 million people to receive Covid-19 vaccines will either be in nursing homes or be at-risk healthcare workers. After that, it’s essential workers or people with health risks. The devil will be in the detail.

My flu shot story at the top of this post gives me hope that CatSalut eventually will get to me, but I’m not expecting one-time allocation to work well. No matter where you are, you shouldn’t either. I hope the pattern of one-time allocation of scarce resources is becoming clear by now. One-time scarce resource allocation is hard and free markets rarely help. The best outcome for everyone is to avoid getting Covid-19 for the next 6-9 months.

To the best of my knowledge, the Trump administration has no nationwide plan in place to distribute and administer a vaccine in the US. It’s worse than that. In order to make Covid-19 numbers look good, Trump has mismanaged or broken reporting systems. For instance, Covid-19 hospital reports don’t reflect conditions on the ground. The evidence suggests that the only allocation problem Trump knows how to solve is how to allocate other people’s money to his pocket.

President-elect Biden will take over about a month after vaccines become available. His choice of Ron Klain as chief of staff will help, as will the task force he assembled in his first announcement as President-elect. A lot of his success will depend on Covid-19 vaccine messaging. Biden already has set the tone by asking Americans to wear masks for the hundred days after his inauguration. But getting them to take Covid-19 vaccines is a whole different ballgame.

If you’re in the US and want to see how many doses of Covid-19 vaccines your state will receive, check the Covid-19 Vaccine Allocation Dashboard. I’ve put it on the Resources page. It’s still amazing to me how much Covid-19 information comes from private efforts rather than government portals.

Another aspect of resource allocation during the pandemic is Covid-19 stimulus packages. As Covid-19 distorts markets and capitalist economies fail to provide food and resources to people, governments have to step in. After passing a stimulus package at the beginning of the pandemic, the US has been unable to agree on a new stimulus package. Among other problems, that will leave 2% of US households (representing about 10% of the population) homeless on New Year’s day.

Stimulus packages have highlighted the biases and structural problems in the US. When the current negotiations started before the November election, Republicans demanded a $500 billion package and Democrats demanded a $2 trillion package. Republicans wanted a smaller package because most of the aid would have gone to blue states. But as Covid-19 spreads to more red states and those states run into economic problems, Republicans now are coming around to a $1 trillion bipartisan proposal. Covid-19 is straining the US political system, highlighting the way the structure of the Senate and electoral college work against the financial interest of a majority of Americans during a crisis.

In the new Covid-19 stimulus package, the US congress probably won’t address structural inequality highlighted by its first package. For instance, a study of PPP payments to restaurants shows a payment bias towards restaurants in wealthier communities. The payment bias probably resulted from the way the program was administered by banks through the SBA. Restaurants in places with healthy banking infrastructure had easier access to cash. In this case, Covid-19 has shown that bias in the US system favors those who already have resources during a crisis. It also highlights that “free markets” probably aren’t providing equal access to resources when there isn’t a pandemic. Poor people have to try harder.

Misinformation compounds problems of allocating scarce resources. Regardless of what continent you are on, this is a great Twitter thread on beating the misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines.

Today’s example of Covid-19 misinformation comes from Covid-19 where Dr. Steven LaTulippe spoke at a Republican “Stop the Steal” protest.

It’s pretty easy to pick out the misinformation if you’re paying attention, and even easier to believe what LaTulippe says if you want to rationalize not using a mask. When he says Covid-19 is just like the flu, he’s wrong. When he says that N95 masks don’t filter Covid-19, he’s wrong. Oregon suspended LaTulippe medical license after this talk.

There was also a kind of misinformation about the origins of Covid-19 floating around my social media bubbles last week. Here’s a good Twitter thread challenging the CDC study.

Also, I wrote a Twitter thread addressing why understanding Covid-19 origins is important.

Covid-19 bits.

My favorite Covid-19 related story last week comes from Belgium. József Szájer, a Hungarian MEP who helped author Hungary’s 2011 constitution that forbids same sex marriage, was caught escaping a men’s sex party. The party ran past the Covid-19 curfew. After police caught Szájer, he issued a statement: “I apologise to my family, to my colleagues, to my voters. I ask them to evaluate my misstep against a background of 30 years of devoted and hard work.” I understand Szájer. Those gay parties are hard work.

No matter where you are, the best thing is to cancel any holiday travel. If you decide to risk a family gathering, everyone should get a Covid-19 test and quarantine for 10 days before gathering. That’s especially true in the US where hospital and ICU beds are in short supply.

Please wear a mask, keep your distance, and wash your hands this holiday season. I don’t do these things for me, I do them for us.


I write this for my own sanity. If you like it, please pass along to friends and family. For more frequent Covid-19 updates, follow me on Twitter.